All parents in every generation worry about
their kids, and try to keep them safe.
They not only do this by not letting them play in traffic or jab sharp
sticks into hornets’ nests, but also by warning them against perennial dangers. In my gentler generation, my parents warned
me about traffic dangers, urging me to look both ways before I crossed the
street, and to extend my hand while crossing, making sure that the cars had
stopped. When older I was warned against
the dangers of “taking drugs”, a warning echoed in the wider culture (“Just Say
No to Drugs”). A younger generation (my
kids) were exhorted not to talk to strangers, and not to get into a car with
them, even if they did promise you candy and they seemed nice. I even taught my kids a secret password, in
case anyone came to get them at school claiming to be sent by me; if they did
not give the password, our kids knew those claiming to be sent by me or their
mother were lying. Increasing
availability of drugs and increased reports of child abductions on the six
o’clock news told us we were living in dangerous times. We needed to teach our children well if they
were to survive, and grow up strong and healthy.
The
times have become even more dangerous for children as we descend further and
further into spiritual barbarism and as every last trace of Christian faith and
morals is banned and banished from our western culture. It was physically dangerous to live in Europe
during the time when the Black Death raged unchecked throughout the land; it is
spiritually dangerous to live in North America now during this time of moral
decay, and of these two dangers, the latter danger is the worse. Indeed, there is probably no more dangerous
place on earth to live than in North America right now.
The
dangers are many and varied, but here I refer to the danger that comes from the
flood of pornography which sweeps our land like a demonic tsunami—or, to vary
the metaphor, like an unchecked and raging pandemic. Lust was always a temptation for both
genders, though some would argue that the temptation affected men more
violently. Accordingly in every
generation prostitutes plied their trade, winning the dubious accolade as “the
world’s oldest profession”. (If the
Genesis creation stories have anything to teach us, they teach us that farming
is actually the world’s oldest profession, but never mind.) Also accordingly, previous generations bought
pornographic images. In my day what
passed for pornography consisted of pictures of naked women, posed coyly behind
beach balls or draped over furniture. Playboy magazine specialized in such, and
did its best to make such images mainstream and acceptable. I remember a Hustler magazine editor heatedly denying that what he published in
his magazines was pornography. He
claimed it was “art”. It was nonsense,
of course, and his aim was simply to make money through the commodification of
the female body (a form of visual prostitution). Even the people buying the stuff knew that it
was not art but pornography, which is why it was often mailed to them in the
advertised “plain brown wrapper”, and which is why stores selling it kept it
behind the counter. The satisfaction of lust was the aim, and no
one ever really read Playboy for the
stories, no matter what they claimed.
But
times have changed, and not for the better.
Now the pornographic industry specializes not so much in coy images of
naked women, but in sexual violence and female degradation. Women are referred to by a host of names no Christian should ever use, and subjected to practices that any sane person would regard as
torture. Such things are not the
occasional exceptions on the fringes for the pornographic industry. They
are now the norm. And all this has become freely available
through the internet. No one now needs
to steel oneself to go into a store and ask for the naughty magazine kept
behind the counter. One only needs
access to a computer and with the click of a key or two, a multitude of images
come flooding into one’s private room for free.
And with the availability of “smart phones” able to access the internet
anywhere, one doesn’t even need a private room.
One can download images in school or at McDonald’s.
The
danger and problem with this freely available porn is not just that it is
sinful. It is sinful, of course, but the problem is graver than that. The real danger is that our young boys are
feeding on such images at a younger and younger age, before they begin to have
real relationships with girls, and these pornographic images and practices
badly skew their developing understanding of sexuality. When therefore they later come to relate to
girls and women, they will not regard the female as a person worthy of respect,
self-sacrifice, and gallantry. The
pornographic images will have dehumanized the female, and sex will not be about
relationship, but about cruelty, debasement and the infliction of pain upon the
vulnerable. Please note that I said “the
vulnerable”, and not necessarily “the adult vulnerable”. All pornography eventually ends in child
pornography, for none are more vulnerable than children. Pornography is addictive, for one becomes
quickly and increasingly desensitized, and to get the same psychic “kick” one
requires ever more explicit and shocking images, ever greater hardcore
cruelty. The defenders of Fifty Shades of Grey should take note,
for the book and its movie are symptoms of a new sickness, and an impetus for
further descent into the degradation of women.
That the book has been written, and the movie directed by women reveals
just how badly feminism has lost its way.
The
current availability of hardcore porn for young boys represents a frontal
assault on their healthy development as men.
It is now possible that an entire generation of men will arise who
regard sexuality simply as an instrument for debasing women, and who make “Bros
before hoes” their unspoken motto. Part
of our task as parents is to warn our children of this danger, and to help them
regard pornography as a dangerous temptation in the same way that ingesting
crystal meth or heroin is a dangerous temptation. It must be avoided for the same
reason—because it is addictive and will harm you. In this dangerous world, we must teach our
children well. And the first step to
teaching them well is to practice what we preach. If we would warn them of the dangers of porn,
we must keep our hearts clean, and have nothing to do with it ourselves.
What the defenders of the writings of The Marquis de Sade try to claim is that his violent, perverted writings are a commentary on the Ancien Regime, and that they have to be understood in the context of the French Revolution. After all, de Sade was eagre to identify himself as Citizen de Sade, and the degenerate protagonists of his novels are aristocrats or clergy.
ReplyDeleteThey might have a point. The vile images of prisoners being abused by the US military at Abu Graibh comes to mind, as well as the some of the perverted, sexual thrill American soldiers got from committing murder at My Lai. All thoroughly documented and stomach-turning reading.
The problem, however, is that too much of that sort of violent pornography is not a political statement. It is a free-market commodity that is killing intimacy and putting people into a fantasy land of imagined encounters that cannot be realised. If that kind of pornography is to be a political statement, it can at least make the political context clear, with an understanding that the reader or viewer is supposed to be disgusted with that kind of abuse. But even then, people still don't get the message. There are better ways of communicating the evils of abuses of power in society than violent porn.