Every Sunday our
little parish serves an abbreviated Matins service before the Divine Liturgy,
and part of that service contains a hymn called an “Exaposteilarion” or “Song
of Light”. In the Sunday Matins, it
consists of a brief meditation upon the Gospel reading narrating one of
Christ’s Resurrection appearances. In
one Song of Light we read the following:
“At the sea of Tiberias,
Thomas was fishing with the sons of Zebedee, Nathaniel, Peter, and two other
disciples of old. Casting to the right at the command of Christ, they caught a
multitude of fish. And Peter, recognizing Him, cast himself into the water.
This was the third time He appeared to them and He showed them bread and fish
upon the coals.”
Every
time I heard this I wondered what could be the significance of Christ showing
them bread and fish upon the coals.
Note: the hymn-writer doesn’t say
that Christ provided a breakfast of bread and fish (though of
course He did), but specifically that He showed
them bread and fish. This act of showing
clearly seems to have been important to the hymn-writer, but I could never
figure out why.
That is, until I read recently about
the important office of hierophant in the ancient world. In the Mystery religions, anyone wanting to participate
in the sacred and saving Mysteries (for example, the Mysteries of Dionysius the
wine-god or those of Demeter the fertility goddess, founder of the famous
Eleusinian Mysteries) had a secret initiation which culminated in being shown
secret cult objects. The person in
charge of these objects of mystical significance was called a “hierophant”,
literally a “sacred show-er”, someone whose task it was to show to the initiate
the sacred cult objects. It occurred to
me that a Byzantine Christian hearing the Song of Light’s reference to Christ
showing His disciples bread and fish would have instantly thought of the work
of a hierophant.
But what then was the significance
of these sacred objects, and what was the point that the hymn-writer was trying
to make? Simply this: that in beholding the fish and the bread, the
disciples were being initiated into the Eucharistic mystery of the Church. When they saw the fish and the bread lying
there upon the coals, they were being told that henceforth all their Eucharistic
meals would be hosted by the risen Christ, and as they ate the fish and bread
with Him there by the sea of Tiberias, so henceforth they would eat the
Eucharist with Him every succeeding Sunday.
From at least the days of catacomb art, the Church’s Eucharist was
symbolized not by bread and wine (as one might perhaps expect), but by bread
and fish. The multiplication of the
loaves and the provision of bread and fish for the multitudes became for the
Church an image and foreshadowing of their own festal meal, especially since
after the multiplication of the loaves Christ gave His teaching about eating
His flesh and drinking His blood (John 6).
We need to remember this every
Sunday when we gather for the Eucharist.
We may think that the person presiding over the meal and mystery is the
one we see with our physical eyes—namely, the priest standing at the
altar. But that is not so. The real host of the meal is the risen Christ,
the One whom we see invisibly with the eyes of faith. He provided a meal of fish and bread for His
disciples that cold and fresh morning by the sea of Tiberias after a long and
fruitless night of fishing. He provides
a similar meal of Eucharistic bounty and grace for us now every Sunday
morning. It is okay that we come to that
meal tired, and sinful, and empty, and needy.
We also have fished all night and caught nothing. His word to us is the same as it was to them: “Come and have breakfast” (John 21:12). Christ provides a meal which fills and warms
us, and we eat with Him in the light of a new resurrection morning.
So Father, do we have any idea (time wise) of the when the tradition evolved - or changed from bread and fish to bread and wine?
ReplyDeletePrecise dating is difficult, but in general it was after Constantine that the church's art started to prefer the realistic to the symbolic. Thus by 692 the Quinisext Council passed a canon which said that icons should paint Christ as a man, and not portray Him symbolically as a lamb (Canon 82).
Delete