In my mere six decades or so upon the earth
I have seen many strange “icons”. I have
found icons of Thomas Merton, of J.R.R. Tolkien, and of Dorothy Day. I have found icons of the Theotokos in which
the Mother of God and her Son were dressed as Apaches. I have found a “Trinity” icon, presenting the
Three as three women, encircled by a serpent.
And as you can see, I have found the Theotokos and her Son wrapped in
symbols of the Canadian flag, with her customary stars consisting of clusters
of four Canadian maple leaves, with the hems of her garment draped in maple
leaves, and with Christ wearing a robe adorned with maples leaves. As a proud Canadian, you might think I would
rejoice to see Christ and His Mother essentially wrapped in my country’s flag.
In fact I do not.
No doubt the iconographer producing this image had
good intentions, and presumably intended to portray the Theotokos and her Son
as the salvation of Canada. But that is
just the problem. Christ and His Mother
are not just the salvation of Canada, but the salvation of every nation. The Mother of God is not the Joy of Canada,
but the Joy of All who Sorrow, whether the sorrowful live in Canada, America,
Russia or the Middle East, and claiming her as Canada’s own can pay very poor political
dividends when Canada has a quarrel with other nations. Nonetheless the tradition of claiming God as
the special possession or patron of one’s own nation has a very long history. One thinks of the English going to war
against the French invoking the aid of God and St. George. One thinks of Germany going to war against
England, inscribing “Gott mit uns” on their soldiers’ helmets. This temptation to monopolize the Most High
is rooted in the confusion between patriotism and nationalism.
Patriotism
is good, and may be defined as love of one’s home. A healthy patriotism is positive, not
comparative; it loves one’s familiar home simply because it is one’s home, and does not
instinctively pick a quarrel against anyone else and their home. For example, I love Canada simply because it
is my home, and I love hockey because it is our national sport which I played
when I was young. I expect that
Americans to the south of me would love America just as much because it is their home, and baseball because it is their national sport. I do not compare the two and assert that
Canada is better than America, or that hockey is better than baseball. Each person loves their own country better
than they love other countries because that is the place they call home, a
place of comfort and familiarity, and they prefer their own national sports,
foods, clothing, and entertainments for the same reason. Patriotism is good.
Sometimes,
however, patriotism can morph into nationalism.
Nationalism may be defined as the conviction that one’s own country is
not only good, but actually better than all other countries. Nationalism is comparative in its
essence—that is, it is imperialistic. A
nationalist will not only say that he loves his country because it is his home,
but because it is in fact superior to all other countries, and if those living
in other countries had his sense, they would prefer his country to their own
too. In this frame of mind, God sides
with his country because God has the sense to discern its superiority. For the English nationalist, for example, God
and St. George side with England because England is much better than every
other place; for the German nationalist, Gott is “mit uns” because He shares
the German nationalist’s insistence on German superiority. And as said above, when nations quarrel,
these convictions pay very poor dividends.
The
main problem though is not simply with the poor political dividends, but the
theological ones. According to our
Orthodox theology, the central focus of the Christian must be
eschatological. That is, the Christian
is one who confesses that he is a stranger and an exile on the earth (1 Pt.
1:17, 2:11), who declares that “Here we have no continuing city” (Heb. 13:14). Once we belonged to this earth with her
multitude of tribes and tongues, but in baptism Christ chose us out of the
world, so that we are now in the
world, but not of it (Jn.
15:19). Patriotism is compatible with
this eschatological orientation; we can deeply love our country even while
confessing that our fundamental citizenship is in the Kingdom (Phil.
3:20). One can be both a true patriot
and a true Christian. But the
nationalism I have been describing is not as compatible with it, for it defines
our citizenship and primary loyalty to be in our earthly country, not our
heavenly one. The nationalist will think
that if the Theotokos is wrapped in the flag of his country, she must therefore
side with it when it quarrels with another country. If, for example, we wrap her in the American
flag, she must support American foreign policy; if we wrap her in the Canadian
flag, she clearly supports Canada. That
is why we must refuse to wrap her in the flag of any country, for she loves and
prays for all countries with the love of her Son, shining upon the just and the
unjust (Mt. 5:45). God may perhaps
indeed side with one country over another when nations quarrel, but humility
will confess that we are inadequate judges of such things. The temptations to pride and blindness are
too great and terrible; it is better to do our humble best down here and not
presume to speak on God’s behalf.
Patriotism
is good. But its days are numbered, for
patriotism is rooted in our earthly existence, and earth’s days are
numbered. Eventually Christ will return
and “the heavens will pass away with a loud noise and the elements will be
dissolved with fire and the earth and the work that are upon will be burned up”
(2 Pt. 3:10). That will be the end of
patriotism. But not the end of joy—the
good things we have known and loved in our countries, these good things will
abide, transfigured and made eternal in the new heavens and the new earth. That joy and those good things—earthly things
such as love, friendship, kindness, loyalty—these things will not pass
away. Meanwhile as we wait for that day,
let us thank God for the good things He gives us now and look to Him for help
in our sorrows. The Mother of God is the
joy of all the earth. She loves everyone
here in this life, and leads us to our true home in heaven.
Thank you, Father, for the clear definitions and for making this distinction between patriotism and nationalism. I become very uneasy when I see the two blurring into each other. A happy Canada Day to you.
ReplyDeleteThank you for commenting and for your good wishes! And (if you are living 'down south') a very happy Independence Day to you later this week on July 4!
ReplyDeleteWould you say that recognizing the difference between nationalism and patriotism and then ultimately that even patriotism will disappear is a type of guarding the heart? Because as I read, I am reminded of God so that is why I wondered if it was similar.
ReplyDeleteCanada was never an Orthodox civilisation, and in the old Orthodox countries, there is not one canonical icon to be found of either Christ or the Theotokos in nationalistic garb. This crosses the line into idolatry and the abuses of icons condemned by the Seventh Ecumenical Council. We only have icons within limitations.
ReplyDeleteGavin: I absolutely agree with you. Well said.
ReplyDeleteTeresa: quite so. I think that today especially when nationalism disguises itself as patriotism to advance its idolatrous claims that it is important to guard the heart to distinguish between the two. Otherwise a dangerous nationalism can easily lead us astray.
ReplyDeleteThank you Father Lawrence for this insightful article. I agree that it is potentially dangerous to conflate our Christianity with symbols of the nation, even if we love it in a proper, patriotic sense. I think that once the connection is made, there is no control of how it would develop within the community.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Michael, for your comments. I may add that it is also unwise to conflate our Christianity with any particular political party, many seem to be doing now. We must insist that it is possible to vote in good conscience for any political party, since no one party has a monopoly on righteousness and truth.
ReplyDelete