On the eve of the commemoration of the
Fathers of the First Ecumenical Council of Nicea, there are three Old Testament
lessons read at Great Vespers. Two of
them are not unexpected: from the Book
of Deuteronomy, we have one lesson about Moses’ call to appoint elders to
govern the vast numbers of Israel, and another lesson about how Israel must not
harden their hearts in stubbornness.
Makes sense—the bishops gathered at Nicea in 325 to govern the Church were
like the elders that Moses appointed to govern Israel, and it was important
that Church receiving the bishops’ wisdom not harden their hearts stubbornly,
like Arius did. One can see why those
lessons were chosen for the feast of the Nicene Fathers. But the third lesson is a bit of a puzzle—the
story of Abraham and Lot and the armies of the pagans.
Read
all about it in Genesis 14:14-20. Lot
and Abraham settled down in the occupied Land of Canaan, Abraham settling in
Hebron, and Lot in the more lush area of Sodom.
Unfortunately for Lot, an alliance of pagan kings from the north
conducted a raid on the area around Sodom, vanquishing its kings and taking
lots of plunder before returning home.
Among the plunder was Lot.
Someone who escaped from the scene of battle carnage fled to Hebron to
tell Abraham what had happened to his nephew Lot. Abraham’s response was immediate: he gathered together an army (or raiding
party, as we might say today) and gave chase.
They went far into the north, overtook them, routed them, and brought back
Lot to safety. On the way back home, he
was met by Melchizedek, king of Salem, who brought out bread and wine as priest
of El Elyon, God Most High. A good story, one that would make a great
movie. But what on earth does it have to
do with the Fathers gathered at Nicea?
The
answer lies in a small detail mentioned almost in passing: Abraham “led forth his trained men, born in
his house, three hundred and eighteen of them” (verse 14). And how many bishops were there at Nicea who
rallied around the truth proclaimed by Athanasius and who produced the
statement now known as the Nicene Creed?
You guessed it: three hundred and
eighteen. In fact the creed of Nicea was
traditionally known as “the creed of the three hundred and eighteen” (from the definition
of faith of the council of Chalcedon).
For the one who chose the lessons for the feast of the Nicene Fathers,
that number practically jumped off the page of Genesis, and the typological
analogy was too good not to use. Just as
Abraham had gathered an army of three hundred and eighteen and rescued his
kinsman Lot from pagan captivity, so Jesus, the Seed of Abraham, gathered an
army of three hundred and eighteen to rescue His children from heretical
error. Armies are indispensible when war
threatens, and those who fight in them to protect and save us are justly
honoured as war heroes. The bishops who
gathered at Nicea are justly honoured as well.
In the case of Athanasius (at the time of the Nicene council, a mere
deacon), he would suffer much for the faith, being exiled many times in the
long aftermath of the council when the faith of Nicea strove for ascendency
against the Arians. A war hero indeed.
This
tells us that the choices between truth and error, between orthodoxy and
heresy, are not merely intellectual options, parts of a mental game played by
scholars when they’re bored. The contest
between truth and error is part of a war, the eternal war between light and darkness,
between God and Satan, between the woman clothed with the sun and the dragon
(Revelation 12). A war is going on
around us, and Nicea was only one battle in that long contest. Other battles are being fought even now, and
show up in blogs and on the six o’clock news.
We are all caught up in it. All
the more reason to honour the war heroes, like the Fathers of the First
Ecumenical Council.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.